About this historical patient account: The information below describes reported observations from one case. It does not establish treatment efficacy, safety, a causal relationship or an expected outcome. Outcomes vary, and reported improvement does not demonstrate cure. Do not change prescribed medicines or delay established care based on this account.
Intervention context: This account does not establish that the cell, growth-factor or other biological interventions described are approved or effective for this diagnosis. Some may be investigational. A qualified specialist should explain the current evidence, regulatory status, alternatives, uncertainties and risks before any treatment decision.
Case Study: Spinal Cord Reconstruction Surgery for Complete Spinal Cord Injury
Patient Information:
Admission History:
A 34-year-old male presented to Beijing Puhua International Hospital with a history of lower limb mobility disorder following a car accident more than three months prior.
Diagnosis:
Complete spinal cord injury (SCI) at D5-6 level, secondary paraplegia, left hemo-thorax, right pneumothorax, comminuted fracture of the left tibia, and minimal abdominal fluid collection with fractured ribs. The injury was confirmed by MRI on July 15, 2012.
Treatment:
The patient underwent Spinal Cord Reconstruction Surgery and Neural Growth Factor Therapy in two stages:
First Stage (October 17, 2012): Intra-spinal exploration via a posteromedial approach through the original incision was performed. Nerve cell activation with lesion biopsy was also conducted.
Second Stage (July-August 2013): Four courses of Neural Growth Factor Therapy were administered via lumbar puncture on July 15, 19, 22, and 26, respectively.
Medical Condition before Treatment:
Postoperative Course:
One month after surgery (November 2012):
Nine months after surgery (July 2013):
Patient Satisfaction and Follow-up:
Tamer expressed satisfaction with his initial response to the Spinal Cord Reconstruction Surgery and Neural Growth Factor Therapy. Close monitoring of his physical condition will continue at Beijing Puhua International Hospital.
Conclusion:
This case describes reported changes in sensation, muscle tone and movement after several interventions. It cannot establish treatment efficacy or predict outcomes for other people with complete spinal cord injury.
About this historical patient account: The information below describes reported observations from one case. It does not establish treatment efficacy, safety, a causal relationship or an expected outcome. Outcomes vary, and reported improvement does not demonstrate cure. Do not change prescribed medicines or delay established care based on this account.
Intervention context: This account does not establish that the cell, growth-factor or other biological interventions described are approved or effective for this diagnosis. Some may be investigational. A qualified specialist should explain the current evidence, regulatory status, alternatives, uncertainties and risks before any treatment decision.
Case Study: Spinal Cord Reconstruction Surgery for Spinal Cord Injury
Patient Information:
Medical History and Admission:
Christopher Paul, a 21-year-old male, was admitted to Beijing Puhua International Hospital with a three-year history of movement disorder in his right leg following a previous injury.
Preoperative Evaluation:
Treatment and Intervention:
After admission, Christopher underwent spinal cord injury exploration via a posterior midline approach. Intraoperative management included fluid infusion to prevent dehydration, meticulous hemostasis, infection prophylaxis, and administration of cerebral nutrients. In conjunction with neurosurgical intervention, Neural Growth Factor Therapy was administered via lumbar puncture.
Postoperative Course and Outcome:
Following 19 days of inpatient treatment, including surgery and rehabilitation training, Christopher reported significant improvement in his mid-body and upper limb strength. The surgical wounds healed Class-A, with stitches removed successfully. Christopher expressed extreme satisfaction with the initial therapeutic response.
Conclusion:
This case describes reported changes following surgery, Neural Growth Factor Therapy and rehabilitation. It cannot establish the efficacy of any one intervention or predict results for other patients.
About this historical patient account: The information below describes reported observations from one case. It does not establish treatment efficacy, safety, a causal relationship or an expected outcome. Outcomes vary, and reported improvement does not demonstrate cure. Do not change prescribed medicines or delay established care based on this account.
Case Study: Spinal Cord Reconstruction Surgery for Spinal Cord Injury
Patient Information:
Diagnosis: Lumbar spinal cord injury with subsequent paralysis of lower limbs and reduced sensation.
Treatment Course:
Mr. Talaout sustained a lumbar spinal cord injury in 2010, leaving him wheelchair-bound for six years. After exhausting local treatment options, he found information about spinal cord injury care at Beijing Puhua International Hospital online in late 2015. Upon reviewing his medical records and discussing his case with the hospital's professionals, Mr. Talaout traveled to China for treatment in March 2016.
Upon arrival at Beijing Capital Airport, Mr. Talaout was greeted by hospital staff who facilitated a smooth admission process. Clinical tests and comprehensive medical investigations revealed no significant changes compared to his previous reports. A customized three-week treatment program including a neurological procedure, rehabilitation, traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), and supportive therapies was implemented.
Treatment Outcomes:
Mr. Talaout's treatment at Beijing Puhua International Hospital progressed smoothly, and he was discharged according to schedule. Post-discharge, he continued with recommended rehabilitation exercises to enhance functional recovery.
One year after his treatment, Mr. Talaout sent a letter to the hospital, enthusiastically describing his significant improvements. Included photographs and videos showed him standing independently with minimal external support and walking using crutches. Although he still requires time to walk independently, this progress has renewed hope for both Mr. Talaout and his family.
Conclusion:
This case reports changes after several interventions and continued rehabilitation. It cannot establish which intervention caused those changes or demonstrate the efficacy or safety of neural repair therapies.
Disclaimer: Results may vary from person to person. Always consult with a healthcare professional before making medical decisions.
About this historical patient account: The information below describes reported observations from one case. It does not establish treatment efficacy, safety, a causal relationship or an expected outcome. Outcomes vary, and reported improvement does not demonstrate cure. Do not change prescribed medicines or delay established care based on this account.
Intervention context: This account does not establish that the cell, growth-factor or other biological interventions described are approved or effective for this diagnosis. Some may be investigational. A qualified specialist should explain the current evidence, regulatory status, alternatives, uncertainties and risks before any treatment decision.
Patient Information
Treatment Course
Cesar sustained a severe SCI following an accidental three-story fall. Initial CT scan revealed a significant fracture at vertebra T-11. After anatomical fixation surgery, Cesar sought further improvement and traveled to Beijing Puhua International Hospital for spinal cord reconstruction.
Medical History
Outcome
Cesar's condition demonstrated marked improvement following the treatment regimen. Through intensive rehabilitation exercises, he regained the ability to stand and walk forward with assistance from a therapist and orthotics—a feat previously unattainable. Upon discharge, Cesar expressed optimism about returning to a relatively normal personal and professional life as a dentist in Brazil.
Conclusion
This case reports changes after surgery and supportive care. It cannot establish the contribution of each intervention, treatment efficacy or expected outcomes for other patients.
Disclaimer: Individual results may vary. This case study is intended for educational purposes only.